The GDNNOP is just off the hook!

In the conversation about the house, we have Jenn (on the 201+ page, scroll to find) who talks about her husband being a CPS person and he sees nothing actionable in the show. Also on the same thread page, Anya, one of the blog mods, thanks her and says its nice to hear from a professional. (Scroll down a few posts from Jenn's and you'll see it.)

This is a very interesting exchange. For a blog that took the Penn Mommy issue so personally and has a new blog about anonymity on the net, I would think they would ask for more proof than some random, anonymous person talking about having a family member in CPS. Seems a bit like the pot calling the kettle black as they have about the GWOP and its sources.


Methinks the old gals at Gosselins Do Not Need Our Pity are a little hypocritical...or maybe it is all part of their propaganda machine- "disinformation", "oversimplification" and "virtue words" all seem to be a part of this latest attempt at credibility on the part of the GDNNOP.

Under the propaganda post the author states, "While of course it is not solely the anti-Gosselin crowd that engages in propaganda tactics, I do think it's fair to say that such behavior is more prevalent in their community." In this case, I would change "anti-Gosselin" to GDNNOP" and I'd say they'd just about have it right.